Event #1 Blog: Hot Cling, Shear Magic, and the Mouthfeel of Capitalism
For my first event this quarter, I attended the LASER (Leonardo Art Science Evening Rendezvous) Zoom by Hannah Landecker and Patricia Olynyk on processed foods and health. As I have never touched on the topic of food science, and with Professor Landecker's professional background in biology, I believe that I have learned a lot from this event. I would recommend this event to others for the invaluable insights it offers.
This topic later brings me to the realization that the disconnection between art and science may contribute to the continuation of misleading narratives in food marketing. While science is trying to uncover factual information about nutrition and health, art, in the form of advertising, often distorts these facts to sell products. The two sides of scientists and artists must negotiate the gap between the canon and rationality, as artists are not only critical in helping to heal and bridge the painful communication gap but are in a position to play a critical role (Vesna, 122). Particularly in this case, the advertisements created could align with the scientific discoveries of food technology and avoid the potential harm unhealthy food may bring upon us.
Fagerberg, Petter, et al. “Ultra-processed food advertisements dominate the food advertising landscape in two Stockholm areas with low vs high socioeconomic status. Is it time for regulatory action?.” BMC public health, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019, p. 1717. 10.1186/s12889-019-8090-5.
FoodSafety4EU. “What are emulsifiers and what are common examples used in food?” Eufic, 1 October 2022, https://www.eufic.org/en/whats-in-food/article/what-are-emulsifiers-and-what-are-common-examples-used-in-food.
Pannett, Rachel. “New review links ultra-processed foods to 32 health problems: What to know.” The Washington Post, 29 February 2024, https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2024/02/29/ultraprocessed-foods-health-risk/.
Vesna, Victoria. “Toward a Third Culture: Being in Between.” Leonardo, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 121-25, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1577014.
Comments
Post a Comment